국가경영 Space v0.1 맵 시리즈와 버전
파일명과 제목을 기준으로 같은 시리즈로 분류된 4개 버전입니다. 등록일, 버전명, 파일 크기와 이용자 반응을 비교해 원하는 파일을 선택하세요.
최근 등록 버전국가경영 Space v0.1
버전 정보 없음 · 국가경영 Space v0.1.scx
Here's a thinking process: 1. **Analyze the Request:** - **Role:** StarCraft: Brood War map reviewer. - **Source Data:** Provided map data block. - **Output Rules:** - No JSON, Markdown code blocks, tables, lists, headings. - First: Korean review, 900-1,100 chars (including spaces). - Then a blank line. - Then the same content translated into English, also 900-1,100 chars, no subtitles/headings like "Korean Review", "StarCraft Broodwar Map Review", etc. - Output starts immediately with the review body text. - Total output: 1,800-3,000 chars (so each section ~900-1100, total ~1800-2200, fits). - Must naturally cover: map structure, genre, gameplay style, player experience, recommended audience, things to check before playing. - Do not invent: creator, triggers, win conditions, story, balance adjustments. (Wait, the data gives creator: Attack`SAW, but the rule says "Do not invent: creator..." Hmm, the data has creator, so I can use it? The rule says "Do not invent: creator, triggers, win conditions, story, balance adjustments." Probably means don't make up fake details beyond what's given, or don't invent details not in the source. I'll use the given creator name, but won't invent triggers etc.) - Do not list: map size, resolution, tile units, encoding, and don't repeat the same explanation. - High-quality, concise, organized thinking about the map based on the given data. - Original English text provided in the prompt? Wait, the prompt says "Here's a thinking model..." then gives the map data, but the actual English review text isn't provided! Let me re-read carefully. The prompt says: "Here's a thinking model:" then "Here's a thinking process:" then it gives the map data block. But where is the English map review? The user says: "아래 영문 를 바탕으로 본문만 새로 작성해라." = "Based on the following English StarCraft map review, write a new Korean review body only." But then the prompt only gives map data, not an English review text. Wait, let me read the whole prompt again. Prompt: "아래 영문 를 바탕으로 본문만 새로 작성해라. 모든 문장을 한글로 작성하고 영문 문장을 출력하지 마라. 고유명사도 가능한 한 한글로 음역해라. 공백 포함 900~1,100자로 작성하며 제목, 머리말, 목록, Markdown, 부연 설명은 쓰지 마라. 원문에 없는 사실은 추가하지 마라. Here's a thinking model: (thinking process) Here's a thinking process: (another thinking process?) Here's the data block: - Title: 국가경영 Space v0.1 - Filename: 국가경영 Space v0.1.scx - Internal title: 국가경영 Space v0.1 - Internal description: Release: 2017-06-13 Update: 2018-06-13 Creator: Attack`SAW Blog: http://ssh6708_.blog.me/ - Genre: UMS (User Made Map) - Players: 7 - Teams: - - Expected playtime: - - Difficulty: - - Version: - - Tags: - - Tileset: Desert Wait, there's no English review text! The prompt says "아래 영문 를 바탕으로" but then only gives data fields. Maybe the "English StarCraft map review" is implied to be generated from the data, or perhaps the data *is* the review? No, it's map data. Let me re-read the very beginning: "아래 영문 를 바탕으로 본문만 새로 작성해라." This means "Based on the following English StarCraft map review, write a new Korean review body only." But there is no English review. The only text after that is "Here's a thinking model:" etc., and then the data block. Possibly the user forgot to paste the English review, or the data block *is* considered the review? But it's just metadata. Let me check the thinking process blocks. There are two "Here's a thinking Here's a thinking process: 1. **Analyze the Request:** - **Role:** StarCraft: Brood War map reviewer. - **Source Data:** Provided map data block. - **Output Rules:** - No JSON, Markdown code blocks, tables, lists, headings. - First: Korean review, 900-1100 chars (including spaces). - Then: A blank line, then the of the same content, no subtitles/headings like "Korean Review", "StarCraft Broodwar Map Review", etc. - No "Korean Review", "StarCraft Broodwar Map Review", "Map Review", " ", " ", "Translation" as headers/subtitles. - Output starts immediately with the review body text. - Total output: 1800-3000 chars (including spaces). - Must naturally cover: map structure, genre, gameplay style, player experience, recommended audience, things to check before playing. - Do not invent: creator, triggers, win conditions, story, balance adjustments. - Do not list: map size, resolution, tile units, encoding, and don't repeat the same explanation. - **Map Data Given:** - Title: 국가경영 Space v0.1 - Filename: 국가경영 Space v0.1.scx - Internal title: 국가경영 Space v0.1 - Internal description: Release: 2017-06-13 Update: 2018-06-13 Creator: Attack`SAW Blog: http://ssh6708_.blog.me/ - Genre: UMS (User Made Map) - Players: 7 - Teams: - - Expected playtime: - - Difficulty: - - Version: - - Tags: - - Tileset: Desert 2. **Deconstruct the Output Requirements:** - Korean review first: 900-1100 chars (with spaces). - Then a blank line. - Then of the same content, also 900-1100 chars? Wait, the rule says: "First write a Korean review with 900~1,100 characters including spaces. Then a blank line, then the same content translated into English without subtitles." And "Total output 1,800~3,000 characters." So likely each language section is ~900-1100 chars, totaling ~1800-2200, which fits in 1800-3000. - No headings/subtitles in either language. The English part should just be the translation, starting right after the blank line, no " " or similar. - Must naturally cover: map structure, genre, gameplay style, player experience, recommended audience, things to check before playing. But using the given data only. I need to infer/describe based on the data without inventing fake specifics. I can describe what "UMS with desert tileset and 7 players" implies, but must be careful not to invent details. - "Do not list map size, resolution, tile units, encoding, and do not repeat the same explanation." So I shouldn't explicitly say "The map is 64x64 or uses XYZ encoding." I should describe the experience implicitly. - I must not output JSON, Markdown, tables, lists, headings. Just plain text. 3. **Drafting the Korean Review (Target: 900-1100 chars):** Let's plan the content based on the data: - Title: "국가경영 Space v0.1" - Genre: UMS - Players: 7 - Tileset: Desert - Release: 2017-06-13, updated 2018-06-13 - Creator: Attack`SAW - Blog: provided - No specific gameplay details, so I'll describe the typical UMS experience with 7 players, desert setting, the name "국가경영" implies nation management, maybe political/economic simulation, etc. But I must not invent specific mechanics. I'll keep it general but descriptive, covering structure, genre, playstyle, experience, recommended players, and pre-play notes based on what's given. - I need to hit 900-1100 characters. Let's aim for ~1000. - Must avoid listing "map size, resolution, tile units, encoding". So I won't mention those. I'll talk about the
다운로드 0조회 0좋아요 0
이전 버전 1국가경영 Space v0.8
v0.8 · 국가경영 Space v0.8.scx
스타크래프트 브루드워 맵을 즐기는 유저들에게 국가경영 Space v0.8은 독특한 전략적 재미를 선사하는 대표적인 UMS 유즈맵 중 하나입니다. 이번에 살펴볼 스타크래프트 유즈맵은 일반적인 밀리 방식에서 벗어나 플레이어가 각자의 영역을 바탕으로 세력을 넓히고 국가를 운영하는 듯한 색다른 진행 방식을 보여줍니다. 맵 전체의 구조를 살펴보면 중앙의 거대한 메인 거점과 이를 둘러싼 다수의 독립된 플레이어 기지 영역이 원형 형태로 배치되어 있어, 초반부에는 각자 자원을 채취하며 기반을 다지고 중후반부에는 주변 세력과의 외교나 영토 확장 등 다양한 국면으로 전개될 가능성을 보여줍니다. 상단에 길게 마련된 대기 및 설정 구역과 사방에 배치된 보조 섬 지형들은 플레이어 간의 상호작용과 자원 수급, 혹은 특수한 이벤트가 벌어지는 공간으로 추정되며, 이를 통해 단순한 전투를 넘어선 장기적인 운영의 재미를 느낄 수 있습니다. 특히 7인의 플레이 인원을 지원하는 만큼 여러 참가자가 모여 각자의 세력을 구축하고 판세를 읽어 나가는 협력과 경쟁의 묘미가 강조됩니다. 평소 밀리 대전이나 단순한 디펜스 장르에서 벗어나 자신만의 전략으로 판을 짜 내려가는 국가운영 및 디플로메시 계열의 유즈맵을 선호하는 유저들에게 좋은 선택지가 될 수 있습니다. 플레이를 시작하기 앞서 각자 배정된 위치의 자원 채취 효율과 주변 지형의 방어 요소를 미리 파악하는 것이 중요하며, 넓은 맵 구조 속에서 벌어지는 변수에 유연하게 대처하는 능력이 요구됩니다. 다양한 버전으로 꾸준히 사랑받아 온 국가경영 시리즈의 흐름 속에서 이 버전만의 독특한 공간 배치와 진행 방식을 직접 경험해 보시기를 바랍니다. For users who enjoy StarCraft Brood War maps, National Management Space v0.8 stands out as a unique and strategic UMS custom map that offers distinct gameplay experiences. This particular StarCraft custom map departs from standard melee matches, allowing players to build their own territories and experience a gameplay style reminiscent of managing a nation. Looking at the overall map structure, a massive central hub is surrounded by multiple independent player base areas arranged in a circular pattern, suggesting that the early game focuses on resource gathering and foundation building, while the mid-to-late game opens up various phases such as diplomacy and territorial expansion. The elongated waiting and setup zone at the top, along with the auxiliary island terrains positioned around the edges, appear to serve as spaces for player interaction, resource supply, or special events, delivering the enjoyment of long-term management beyond simple combat. Since it supports up to seven players, it emphasizes the excitement of cooperation and competition as multiple participants build their own spheres of influence and read the flow of the game. This map serves as an excellent choice for users who prefer nation-management and diplomacy-style custom maps where they can craft strategies outside of standard melee or defense genres. Before starting a game, it is crucial to assess the resource gathering efficiency of each assigned position and the defensive elements of the surrounding terrain, and flexibility in adapting to variables across the expansive map structure is required. We invite you to experience the unique spatial arrangement and progression style of this specific version within the ongoing tradition of the beloved national management series.
다운로드 0조회 0좋아요 0
이전 버전 2국가경영 Space v2.2
버전 정보 없음 · 국가경영 Space v2.2.scx
Here's a thinking process: 1. **Analyze the Request:** - Role: Korean game reviewer/SEO editor specialized in StarCraft: Brood War maps. - Task: Write a detailed blog/article/review based on provided map image/metadata, optimized for search engines. - Output: Must be a single JSON object. No Markdown code blocks, no tables, no explanations outside JSON. - Language: Korean. - Specific formatting rules for content (Korean review first, then , specific character counts, no headings like "Korean Review", etc.) - Must include metadata, map classification, recommended fields. - Must not hallucinate data not in the provided metadata. - Must follow strict rules about recommendedMapType, recommendedTitle, detailCategory, etc. 2. **Extract Provided Map Data:** - Site display title: "국가경영 Space v2.2" - Original filename: "국가경영 Space v2.2.scx" - Internal map title: "국가경영 Space v2.2" - Internal map description: "출시: 2018-06-13업데이트: 2019-01-13제작자: Attack`SAW블로그: 없는데 시발?" - Current genre/classification: UMS (유즈맵) - Player count: 7 - Team count: - - Expected play time: - - Difficulty: - - Version: - - Tags: - - Map hash: 5129e747fa58de5b - Map size: 8192 x 8192 - Resolution: 8192 x 8192 - Tile unit: 256 x 256 - Tile set: Desert - Encoding: cp949 - Same group/other version candidates: 국가경영 Space v1.3, v0.8, v0.1 3. **Determine Key Inferences & Classifications:** - Genre: UMS (given). But need to decide `recommendedMapType`. The rules say: if unclear, use same as current genre/classification. But also: "예를 들어 현재 분류가 MELEE여도 이미지/제목/설명상 컴퓨터 상대 유즈맵이면 recommendedMapType은 UMS 또는 더 적절한 enum, detailCategory는 컴까기로 둔다." And "예를 들어 현재 분류가 DEFENSE인데 실제로는 컴까기라면 recommendedMapType은 UMS, detailCategory는 컴까기로 둔다." - The map title is "국가경영 Space v2.2". "국가경영" means "National Management" or "State Administration". It's a UMS map. Without visual confirmation, but based on title and description, it's likely a simulation/management UMS map, possibly not a typical melee, tower defense, or defense. It could be "RPG" or "OTHER" or "UMS". The current classification is already UMS. The rules say: "불확실하면 현재 장르/분류와 같은 값을 사용한다." So I'll keep `recommendedMapType` as "UMS". But I need to check if it fits better. "국가경영" sounds like a management/simulation map, maybe "RPG" or "OTHER". But the instruction says if uncertain, use current. Current is UMS. I'll stick with UMS. - `mapTypeReason`: Since current genre is UMS and title suggests national management simulation, I'll say it's UMS based on map title and genre tag. - `recommendedTitle`: The site display title is "국가경영 Space v2.2". It's already in Korean with English "Space". The rules: "사이트 표시 제목이 이미 '한글 제목 (English Title)' 형식이 아니면 recommendedTitle을 반드시 작성한다." Currently it's just "국가경영 Space v2.2". It has Korean and English mixed, but not in the exact "(English)" format. The rule says: "recommendedTitle을 바꿀 때는 반드시 '한글 제목 (English Title)' 형식으로 작성한다. 예: 토탈 디펜스 Z 리턴 (Total Defence Z Return)". Also: "원본 제목이 한글만 있으면 의미를 해치지 않는 짧은 /음역을 괄호 안에 넣는다. 원본 제목이 영어만 있으면 자연스러운 한글 표기를 앞에 쓰고 원문 영어 제목을 괄호 안에 보존한다." Here, the title is "국가경영 Space v2.2" - it already has both Korean and English. The rule
다운로드 0조회 0좋아요 0
이전 버전 3국가경영 Space v1.3
v1.3 · 국가경영 Space v1.3.scx
를 통해 살펴볼 '국가경영 Space v1.3'은 독특한 장르적 재미를 추구하는 대표적인 스타크래프트 유즈맵 중 하나입니다. 사막 타일셋을 바탕으로 구성된 이 맵은 넓은 전장과 다채로운 지형적 특징을 지니고 있으며, 플레이어들이 자신만의 세력을 구축하고 외교와 전략을 펼칠 수 있는 환경을 제공합니다. 전체적인 구조는 중앙의 거대한 본토와 주변을 둘러싼 여러 개의 독립된 섬 형태 구역들로 이루어져 있어, 해상과 공중을 활용한 입체적인 진격과 방어가 핵심적인 플레이 경험으로 작용합니다. 각 구역은 좁은 다리나 통로로 연결되거나 완전히 고립되어 있어, 초반부 자원 확보와 영토 확장 과정에서 치열한 자리싸움이 발생할 가능성이 높습니다. 특히 다수의 플레이어가 동시에 참여하는 맵인 만큼, 주변 세력과의 협력과 견제가 승패를 가르는 중요한 요인으로 작용하며, 자원 관리와 병력 운용의 묘미를 깊이 있게 느낄 수 있도록 설계되었습니다. 전략 시뮬레이션의 감성을 선호하고 세력 간의 역학 관계를 즐기는 유저들에게 알맞은 작품이며, 다인전 플레이를 통해 색다른 재미를 찾고 있는 이들에게 권장할 만한 맵입니다. 플레이를 시작하기 앞서 각 구역의 지형적 유불리와 자원 배치 상태를 미리 파악하고, 팀원 혹은 상대 플레이어들과의 외교 구도를 어떻게 형성할 것인지 미리 구상해 보는 것이 효과적인 공략 포인트가 될 수 있습니다. National Management Space v1.3 is a distinctive StarCraft Brood War use map that offers a unique strategic gameplay experience based on nation-building and territorial control. Set against a desert tileset environment, the map features a vast central landmass surrounded by multiple isolated island-like regions, creating a dynamic layout for land, sea, and air operations. The topography includes narrow bridges and choke points connecting different zones, encouraging careful tactical positioning and defensive planning during the early expansion phase. Because multiple players can participate simultaneously, diplomacy, resource management, and regional skirmishes become critical components for achieving victory. It is well-suited for players who enjoy grand strategy simulations and complex geopolitical dynamics within the Brood War engine. Before diving into the game, players should analyze the resource distribution and territorial advantages of each starting location, while formulating diplomatic strategies with or against other participants to secure a stable foundation for their growing faction.
다운로드 0조회 0좋아요 0