Complete Ice BGH 맵 시리즈와 버전
파일명과 제목을 기준으로 같은 시리즈로 분류된 2개 버전입니다. 등록일, 버전명, 파일 크기와 이용자 반응을 비교해 원하는 파일을 선택하세요.
최근 등록 버전Complete Ice BGH
버전 정보 없음 · [__8]Complete_Ice_BGH.scx
Here's a thinking process: 1. **Analyze the Request:** - **Input:** A set of StarCraft: Broodwar map metadata (title, filename, internal title, description, genre, players, etc.) - **Output Requirements:** - First part: Korean review body, 900-1100 characters (including spaces) - Then: A blank line, then the same content again in Korean, no headings/lists/Markdown - Total output: 1800-3000 characters (so two reviews of 900-1100 each, back-to-back) - No JSON, no Markdown code blocks, no tables, no lists, no headings/subtitles - No forbidden subtitles: "Korean Review", "StarCraft Broodwar Map Review", "Map Review", etc. - Output starts immediately with review text - Must cover: map structure, genre, gameplay style, player experience, recommended players, pre-play checks - Must NOT invent: creator, triggers, win conditions, story, balance changes - Must NOT list: map size, resolution, tile units, encoding, repeat same explanations - **Map Data Given:** - Title: Complete Ice BGH - Filename: [__8]Complete_Ice_BGH.scx - Internal title: Complete Ice BGH - Internal description: "Forget all these fake 'BGHs', full winter tileset BGH is here! (v3.0) 3:5 Insane AI computers in UMS. Playtime: from 30 min. to 1 hour. Created by Cyber_Smoke http://smoke.da.ru" - Genre: UMS (custom map) - Players: 3 - Teams: - - Expected playtime: - - Difficulty: - - Version: - - Tags: - - Tileset: Platform (but description says winter tileset - I'll prioritize the descriptive text, maybe note the winter theme, but carefully not invent tile details) 2. **Deconstruct the Map & Plan the Review Content:** Key points from data to include naturally in a review flow: - Map name: Complete Ice BGH - Genre: UMS custom map, Big Game Hunter style - Theme: Winter/full winter tileset, distinguishes itself from "fake BGHs" - AI: 5 Insane AI computers (or 3:5 notation, I'll phrase as "five Insane AI opponents") - Player count: 3 players - Gameplay duration: 30 minutes to 1 hour - Creator: Cyber_Smoke (I'll mention it briefly as given, but focus on experience) - Style: BGH type, likely elimination/survival against AI, winter aesthetic - Pre-play/checks: AI difficulty, time commitment, winter tileset expectation - Experience: BGH style, replay value, etc. I need to write a continuous Korean text, 900-1100 characters including spaces. Then repeat it (same content) after a blank line, making total 1800-3000. No headings, no Markdown, no lists. Just plain text flow. Let outline the review content in Korean, aiming for ~950 chars first pass, then adjust. Structure ideas (but must be seamless, no bullet points): - Start with map name and what kind of map it is - Describe the winter tileset claim and BGH context - Mention AI setup and player count - Discuss gameplay flow, pace, suitability - Note playtime range - Mention creator briefly as per data - Conclude with recommendations/checks Must avoid: listing tile units, resolution, encoding, repeating explanations, inventing balance/story/triggers. Let's draft the Korean review mentally first, count approximate chars. Draft (mental): "컴플리트 아이스 비지헌터는 겨울 테마를 전면에 내세운 스타크래프트 브로드워 커스텀 맵입니다. 제작자 사이버스모크가 만든 이 맵은 기존의 가짜 BGH들을 배제하고 full winter tileset을 적용했다고 자칭합니다. 게임 모드는 UMS로, 3명의 플레이어가 5개의 인사이드 AI 컴퓨터와 대결하는 형태입니다. 플레이 타임은 30분에서 1시간 정도 소요되며, 겨울 분위기의 타일셋이 맵 전체를 감싸고 있어 색다른 시각적 경험을 제공합니다. BGH 장르 특성상 AI와의 전투와 자원 관리, 유닛 Here's a thinking process: 1. **Analyze the Request:** - **Role:** StarCraft: Broodwar map reviewer - **Input Data:** Map data provided (title, filename, internal title, description, genre, players, etc.) - **Output Rules:** - No JSON, Markdown code blocks, tables, lists, headings - First: Korean review, 900-1100 characters (including spaces) - Then: A blank line, then of the same content, no subtitles/headings - Forbidden subtitles/headings: "Korean Review", "StarCraft Broodwar Map Review", "Map Review", " ", " ", "Translation" - Output starts immediately with the review body text - Total output: 1800-3000 characters (including spaces) - Must cover: map structure, genre, gameplay style, player experience, recommended players, pre-play checks - Must NOT invent: creator, triggers, win conditions, story, balance changes - Must NOT list: map size, resolution, tile units, encoding, repeat same explanations - **Map Data Given:** - Title: Complete Ice BGH - Filename: [__8]Complete_Ice_BGH.scx - Internal title: Complete Ice BGH - Internal description: Forget all these fake "BGHs",*full* winter tileset BGH is here! (v3.0)3:5 Insane AI computers in UMS.Playtime: from 30 min. to 1 hour.Created by Cyber_Smokehttp://smoke.da.ru - Genre: UMS (custom map) - Players: 3 - Teams: - - Expected playtime: - - Difficulty: - - Version: - - Tags: - - Tileset: Platform 2. **Deconstruct the Map Data & Plan the Review:** - *Title:* Complete Ice BGH - *What is BGH?* Big Game Hunter - a popular custom map genre in SC:BW, usually FFA or teams, survival/elimination against AI, often with specific tilesets/heroes/items. This one claims to be a "full winter tileset BGH" and says "forget all these fake BGHs". - *Description key points:* "forget all these fake BGHs", "full winter tileset BGH is here!", v3.0, 3:5 Insane AI computers in UMS, playtime 30 min to 1 hour, created by Cyber_Smoke, from some Russian site (smoke.da.ru) - *Genre:* UMS - *Players:* 3 (so likely 3 players, FFA or 3-team? Since teams -, probably 3 FFA or 3-player BGH) - *Tileset:* Platform (wait, the data says "타일셋: 플랫폼" which means "tileset: Platform". But the description says "full winter tileset BGH". There's a contradiction. "Platform" might be the internal tag, but description says winter tileset. I need to handle this carefully. The rule says "Do not list map size, resolution, tile units, encoding. Do not repeat same explanations." I should mention the winter theme from the description, but not force "Platform" tileset details. I'll focus on what's given and natural.) - *AI:* 3:5 Insane AI computers. Wait, "3:5 Insane AI computers" - maybe means 3 players vs 5 Insane AI? Or 3 players, 5 AI? In BGH, often there are AI opponents. I'll interpret as 5 Insane AI computers total, or maybe 3 players with AI. The text "3:5 Insane AI computers in UMS" is ambiguous. I'll read it as "3 players, 5 Insane AI computers" or maybe "3v5"? Given it's BGH, likely FFA with AI. I'll phrase it naturally without inventing specifics not there.) - *Playtime:* 30 min to 1 hour - *Creator:* Cyber_Smoke (I must NOT invent details beyond what's given. The rule says "Do not invent creator, triggers, win conditions, story, balance adjustments." But the data includes "Created by Cyber_Smokehttp://smoke.da.ru". Is that allowed? The rule says "Do not invent..." but the data provides it. I think I can reference it as given, but not add extra. I'll just say "created by Cyber_Smoke" if needed, but the review should focus on experience. Actually, the
다운로드 0조회 2좋아요 0
이전 버전 1Complete Ice BGH
버전 정보 없음 · [__8]Complete_Ice_BGH.scx
Here's a thinking process: 1. **Analyze the Request:** - **Role:** StarCraft: Brood War map reviewer. - **Task:** Write a review based *only* on the provided map data. - **Output Rules:** - No JSON, Markdown code blocks, tables, lists, headings. - First: Korean review, 900-1,100 characters (including spaces). - Then: A blank line, then the *same content* again, but this time just the text (no subtitle/headings, but the rule says "title, headings, lists, Markdown, supplementary explanation are not to be written." Wait, let me re-read carefully.) - "Output starts immediately with the review body text." - "Total output: 1,800-3,000 characters (including spaces)." -> This means the entire output (both parts?) must be 1,800-3,000 chars. Or maybe each part? The prompt says: "First: Korean review, 900-1,100 characters (including spaces). Then: A blank line, then the same content again, no subtitle/headings. ... Total output: 1,800-3,000 characters (including spaces)." So it's two copies of the same 900-1,100 char review, with a blank line in between, totaling 1,800-3,000 chars. That makes sense. - "Do not write 'Korean Review', 'StarCraft Brood War Map Review', etc. as headings." - "Output starts immediately with the review body text." - "Do not invent: creator, triggers, win conditions, story, balance changes." - "Do not list: map size, resolution, tile units, encoding." - "Do not repeat the same explanation." - "Map Data Provided:" (I'll list the key data points for reference, but the output must not include them as structured data; I must weave the info naturally into the text, or just avoid mentioning things not in the data, and use what's there.) Let me re-read the exact constraints carefully: - "아래 영문 를 바탕으로 본문만 새로 작성해라." -> "Based on the following English StarCraft map review, write only the Korean review body." - "모든 문장을 한글로 작성하고 영문 문장을 출력하지 마라." -> Write all sentences in Korean, don't output English sentences. - "고유명사는 가능한 한 한글로 음역해라." -> Transliterate proper names as much as possible into Korean. - "공백 포함 900~1,100자로 작성하며 제목, 머리말, 목록, Markdown, 부연 설명은 쓰지 마라." -> Write 900-1,100 characters including spaces, do not write title, headings, lists, Markdown, supplementary explanation. - "원문에 없는 사실은 추가하지 마라." -> Do not add facts not in the original text. Wait, there's also: "그리고 그 아래에 동일한 내용을(blank line 후 동일한 내용) 작성하되, 부제목/머리말은 쓰지 마라." Actually the prompt says: "그리고 그 아래에 동일한 내용을(blank line 후 동일한 내용) 작성하되, 부제목/머리말은 쓰지 마라." Wait, let me read the full prompt structure again from the user message: "Here's a thinking process: 1. **Analyze the Request:** ... - "아래 영문 를 바탕으로 본문만 새로 작성해라. 모든 문장을 한글로 작성하고 영문 문장을 출력하지 마라. 고유명사는 가능한 한 한글로 음역해라. 공백 포함 900~1,100자로 작성하며 제목, 머리말, 목록, Markdown, 부연 설명은 쓰지 마라. 원문에 없는 사실은 추가하지 마라. Here's the English map data: [Map data] - "그리고 그 아래에 동일한 내용을(blank line 후 동일한 내용) 작성하되, 부제목/머리말은 쓰지 마라. - 총 출력 문자수는 1,800~3,000자(공백 포함)가 되어야 한다." So the structure should be: [Korean review text, 900-1,100 chars including spaces] [Blank line] [Same Korean review text again, 900-1,100 chars including spaces] Total Here's a thinking process: 1. **Analyze the Request:** - **Role:** StarCraft: Brood War map reviewer. - **Task:** Write a review based *only* on the provided map data. - **Output Rules:** - No JSON, Markdown code blocks, tables, lists, headings. - First: Korean review, 900-1,100 characters (including spaces). - Then: A blank line, then the of the same content, no subtitle/headings. - No "Korean Review", "StarCraft Brood War Map Review", etc. as headings. - Output starts immediately with the review body text. - Total output: 1,800-3,000 characters (including spaces). - Cover: map structure, genre, gameplay style, player experience, recommended audience, pre-play checks. - Do not invent: creator, triggers, win conditions, story, balance changes. - Do not list: map size, resolution, tile units, encoding. - Do not repeat the same explanation. - **Map Data Provided:** - Title: Complete Ice BGH - Filename: [__8]Complete_Ice_BGH.scx - Internal title: Complete Ice BGH - Internal description: Forget all these fake "BGHs", *full* winter tileset BGH is here! (v2.0)3:5 Insane AI computers in UMS.Playtime: from 30 min. to 1 hour.Created by Cyber_Smokehttp://smoke.da.ru - Genre: UMS (user-made map) - Players: 3 - Teams: - - Expected playtime: - - Difficulty: - - Version: - - Tags: - - Tileset: Platform 2. **Deconstruct the Map Data & Extract Key Points:** - Title: Complete Ice BGH - Type: UMS (custom map), BGH (Big Game Hunter - FFA or multiplayer vs AI) - Key feature: "full winter tileset", not fake BGHs - AI: 3:5 Insane AI computers (ratio? 3 players vs 5 AI? Or 3 vs 5? The data says "3:5 Insane AI computers in UMS" - likely means 3 player slots, 5 AI set to Insane, or maybe 3 vs 5. I'll interpret as 3 human/player slots and 5 Insane AI opponents, or maybe 3 players total with AI filling. Actually, BGH typically means Free For All vs AI or multiplayer. I'll read carefully: "3:5 Insane AI computers in UMS.Playtime: from 30 min. to 1 hour." Might mean 3 players, 5 AI? Or 3 vs 5? I'll assume it's a 3-player map with 5 Insane AI, or maybe the ratio is part of the description. I'll just naturally incorporate without over-explaining.) - Tileset: Full winter (platform tileset) - Creator: Cyber_Smoke (but rule says don't invent beyond data? It's provided: "Created by Cyber_Smokehttp://smoke.da.ru" - I can mention it as it's in the data, but the rule says "Do not invent producer, triggers, win conditions, story, balance numbers." The creator is given, so I can use it. But wait: "Do not invent producer..." - the producer is provided, so I'll use the provided name. Actually, the rule says "Provided되지 않은 제작자, 트리거, 승리 조건, 스토리, 밸런스 수치는 지어내지 않는다." (Do not invent producer, triggers, win conditions, story, balance numbers not provided.) Since the creator is in the data, I can use it. But to be safe, I'll just naturally reference it if needed, or avoid emphasizing it if it's not crucial. The focus is on the map experience.) - Genre: UMS - Players: 3 - Gameplay: BGH style, likely AI combat, winter theme - Playtime: 30 min to 1 hour - Key selling point: "Forget all these fake 'BGHs', full winter tileset BGH is here!" 3. **Drafting the Korean Review (900-1,100 characters including spaces):** - Need to write naturally, covering map structure, genre, gameplay style, player experience, recommended audience, pre-play checks. - Must not use headings/lists. - Must be 900-1,100 chars including
다운로드 0조회 2좋아요 0