Недолговечный союз

Here's a thinking process:

1.

Analyze the Request: - Input: StarCraft: Brood War map review data (in English, but with some Cyrillic/encoded text in "Internal description") - Output Rules: - No JSON, Markdown code blocks, tables, lists, headings - First: Korean review, 900-1,100 characters (including spaces) - Then: A blank line, then - "of the same content, no headings/subtitles" - wait, the prompt says: "First: Korean review, 900-1,100 characters (including spaces).

Then: A blank line, then of the same content, no headings/subtitles" - Actually, re-reading carefully: "First: Korean review, 900-1,100 characters (including spaces). Then: A blank line, then of the same content, no headings/subtitles" - Let me read the exact prompt text: "아래 영문

를 바탕으로

본문만 새로 작성해라. 모든 문장을 한글로 작성하고 영문 문장을 출력하지 마라. 고유명사도 가능한 한 한글로 음역해라. 공백 포함 900~1,100자로 작성하며 제목, 머리말, 목록, Markdown, 부연 설명은 쓰지 마라. 원문에 없는 사실은 추가하지 마라." - Then there's a separate block: "Here's a thinking process:" ... and then a lot of text about map data and output rules. - Actually, the prompt structure is: - User message starts with "아래 영문

를 바탕으로..." - Then there's a big block with "Here's a thinking process:" and map data and output rules. - Wait, the prompt might be combining two things. Let me read carefully. - The user message: "아래 영문

를 바탕으로

본문만 새로 작성해라. 모든 문장을 한글로 작성하고 영문 문장을 출력하지 마라. 고유명사도 가능한 한 한글로 음역해라. 공백 포함 900~1,100자로 작성하며 제목, 머리말, 목록, Markdown, 부연 설명은 쓰지 마라. 원문에 없는 사실을 추가하지 마라." - Then on new line: "Here's a thinking process:" ... and it describes map data and output rules.

- Actually, the entire thing after "Here's a thinking process:" seems to be part of the prompt, possibly from a system or user providing context. But the instruction at the very top is the key: "아래 영문

를 바탕으로

본문만 새로 작성해라..." - Then there's map data provided: Title, Filename, Internal title, Internal description, Genre, Players, Teams, Expected play time, Difficulty, Version, Tags, Tileset. - Output rules embedded: "First: Korean review, 900-1,100 characters (including spaces). Then: A blank line, then of the same content, no headings/subtitles.

No 'Korean Review', 'StarCraft Brood War Map Review', etc. as headings. Output starts directly with the review body. Total output: 1800-3000 characters (including spaces). Must cover: map structure, genre, gameplay style, player experience, recommended audience, pre-play notes. Must NOT invent: creator, triggers, win conditions, story, balance changes.

Must NOT list: map size, resolution, tile units, encoding, repeat same explanations." - Wait, there's a conflict or clarification: The very first instruction says "공백 포함 900~1,100자로 작성하며 제목, 머리말, 목록, Markdown, 부연 설명은 쓰지 마라." (Write within 900-1100 characters including spaces, without title, headings, list, Markdown, supplementary explanation.) - But later it says "Total output: 1800-3000 characters (including spaces)." This is confusing.

Which one to follow? - Let me re-read the user message carefully. It starts with "아래 영문

를 바탕으로

본문만 새로 작성해라..." then has the rules. Then "Here's a thinking process:" might be a separator or part of the prompt template. Actually, looking at the structure, it's likely that the user pasted a prompt that includes "Here's a